IT WORKED IN ENGLAND SO WHY NOT HERE

Under the banner of "harmony" and "multi-culturalism" it is now illegal to refer to the terrorists as "Islamic" in England.
They are simply refered to as "asian" which I find a bit odd because most of the muzzies in England happen to be Pakistani and they certainly are not "Asian" now are they.

Anyway, now the muzzies have set their sights on doing the same thing here in the U.S.

A coalition of American Muslim groups is demanding that Sen. John McCain stop using the adjective "Islamic" to describe terrorists and extremist enemies of the United States.
Muneer Fareed, who heads the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), told The Washington Times that his group is beginning a campaign to persuade Mr. McCain to rephrase his descriptions of the enemy.

"We've tried to contact his office, contact his spokesperson to have them rethink word usage that is more acceptable to the Muslim community," Mr. Fareed said. "If it's not our intent to paint everyone with the same brush, then certainly we should think seriously about just characterizing them as criminals, because that is what they are."

An aide to Mr. McCain, the presumptive Republican presidential nominee who is counting on his pro-Iraq war stance to attract conservative voters, said the senator from Arizona will NOT drop the word.
Steve Schmidt, a former Bush White House aide who is now a McCain media strategist, told The Times that the use of the word is appropriate and that the candidate will continue to define the enemy that way.
"...the reality is, the hateful ideology which underpins bin Ladenism is properly described as radical Islamic extremism. Senator McCain refers to it that way because that is what it is". Mr. Schmidt said.

It should be noted that although Mr. McCain often uses the term "Islamic" to describe terrorist enemies, the two remaining Democrats in the presidential field, Sen. Barack Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York, generally shun such word usage.